Jump to content

Talk:Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGuardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 27, 2017Good article nomineeNot listed
March 26, 2018Good article nomineeListed
June 11, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
November 18, 2019Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 2, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that for Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, use of the alien race Sneepers was initially rejected by Marvel's legal department because it sounded too similar to snípur, the Icelandic word for clitoris?
Current status: Good article

RE: Gunn's quote

[edit]

Just a heads-up, Gunn's quote mentions "a Watcher" and not Uatu directly. If other sources mention Uatu, then those sources should be cited. Adding a Uatu to Gunn's quote is misquoting him. DonQuixote (talk) 02:34, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning

[edit]

- We need to get off this planet. ... - The bodies in the caverns... Who are they? - The bodies... are his children.

Most important dialogs not on the main page. Why? 2001:470:28:6ED:39BF:B3FA:DE8A:374F (talk) 18:01, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because this ain't wikiquote or a collection of quotes.Crboyer (talk) 18:15, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Quill

[edit]

Should this article discuss the potential recast of Chris Pratt if Marvel wants to protray his bisexuality in the third film? Warrior4565666666 (talk) 21:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't even being discussed as something happening in the films, so no. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:38, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carveouts to sourcing guidelines

[edit]

If editors would favour a special carveout from RFC findings of WP:GUNREL on a source - e.g. to allow special carveouts for usage of a a source found WP:GUNREL in a broad general RFC - the correct venue for such would be WP:RSN, where the RFC ran - David Gerard (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]